Joe, I am sorry you lost the case. You should have won. I feel for you and your family, especially the family members that are senior citizens.
I admire your strength to speak of your defeat so eloquently and in such an uplifting way. You are living proof that God is on your side.
Merry Christmas and you will have a Happy New Year!

Sorry to hear about this, Mr. Fosco.

The safety and well-being of you and your family is in our prayers. Merry Christmas.

PS: Recent articles have made for good reading–even the recent contributions from Mr. Sharp. Here’s to a good year for KTF Media Group.

Sorry to hear this Joe. When I think of lawyers I don’t think of Mr. Smith goes to Washington types – in fact to me it seems they have their own racket or mob.

And the fact that you are having trouble finding a affordable attorney for what seems to me a strong case speaks volumes of the legal environment of Chicago.

I had a friend a few years back who got his jaw broken outside a club by a bouncer. He had witnesses stating when asked to leave he left premises of club then once outside was suddenly clocked by this ape -fairly certain a bouncer cannot lawfully lay a hand on individual (unprovoked) outside of the establishment.

Making it a good case of assualt/medical liability however due to the town it was in and owner of club (I think it was Cerone) no assault charges were filed and no lawyer would take the case – leaving my friend out money for medical bills.

I’m wondering do you think your friendship with Cerone were the grass shoots for the extortion and other aggravations you encountered or given your Father’s money was it an inevitablility?

Stay frosty and Happy New Year!

It was somewhere in the mid 90′s to early 2000′s – I think Tinley Park but could have been Downers Grove (old Oliver’s?) or unincorporated Elmhurst (Galways?)- maybe not Cerone ownership as you are asking about Chicago but was told through second hand information (I have never personally spoke of this subject with my friend -have seen him twice in ten years- just knew of this event) that it was mob or outfit part owned.

Next time I speak with him I’ll get the 5 W’s and get back to you. Won’t mention name as surely the statute of limitations is up.

I mentioned inevitability because it seems to me the outfit views even old outfit money – as they alleged your family had – as their bank or annuity to be tapped at their liesure. Meaning you were an inevitable target for extortion.

Readers: the message below came in via KTF’s submission page. I see no reason not to add it to the thread.

Message body:

Fratto v. Butterfield Country Club

Wondering if an upcoming article will be titled “Rudy Fratto – jailed can no longer play golf at town of Berwyn council Tony Bertuca’s private country club”
–
This mail is sent via contact form on KTF Media Group http://www.ktfmediagroup.com/home

Dear Anonymous,
Unfortunately, even the most prestigious country clubs do not control a member as to whom he or she can have as a guest. If the guest is not violating club rules, there is no issue. Does anyone know if Butterfield has rules against allowing convicted criminals on their grounds – I think not?
Fortunately, between now and Fratto’s turn in date, I do not predict any weather appropriate for golfing – thank God. However, Fratto could take advantage of the dining room and bar – if invited by a member.
Thanks,
Joe Fosco

Dear Anonymous,
I realize that I failed to answer your question about the relations of the Bertuca’s – I am sorry. Yes, Berwyn’s Bertuca and Lou Bertuca are definitely related – I know this. I believe that Berwyn’s Bertuca and Lou’s father (Chicago Cop) are cousins.

Dear Readers:
Below is another message from ‘anonymous’ that I am adding to the thread.

Message body:
I am not a journalist so figured I would send these messages to you and let you decide if it was relevant.

I know T Bertuca and R Fratto are close and believe their wives are too. I cannot prove this – you probably could -I just know this. Question would be how close Tony is to Lou?

So sort of like Giancana and Kennedy sharing Judith Exoner – on Feb 3 2009 Lou Bertuca was in contact with the President of the United States – surely Lou carries a cell phone and surely if Rudy Fratto or Tony wished to communicate with the President of the United States – a product of the Chicago Democratic machine -it would have been possible.

And on a daily basis these same people can communicate with the Governor of our state as Lou Bertuca is nearly always with the Gov and even carries the Gov’s old worn out leather briefcase called “Betsey”.

I guess it is a stretch but thats how I see it. Let me know what you think.

–
This mail is sent via contact form on KTF Media Group http://www.ktfmediagroup.com/home

Dear Anonymous,
I agree with your logic, it makes sense. However, you should know that Berwyn’s Tony Bertuca and Chicago’s Finest, Tony Bertuca, are not very close, despite their gynecological relation. In addition, Berwyn’s Bertuca would not make contact with his cousin’s son (Lou) directly; he would go thru Lou’s father, Tony the cop. In all honesty, I believe that Tony the cop Bertuca would protect his son like any good father and prevent his son from unethical exposure (assuming that Berwyn’s Bertuca would try something). However, I do believe that Tony the cop Bertuca (Lou’s dad) would lower his guard and rely on his son’s connection with Quinn for favors for his friends, the Duff Family. The Duff Family has an immediate family member in federal prison – Jimmy Duff. Let us keep an eye on things and see if something mysterious happens for the imprisoned Jimmy Duff. The President of the United States (Quinn’s friend) is the top-boss of every federal agency, especially the federal prisons.

Furthermore, with politicians like Illinois State Senator Jimmy DeLeo and/or Illinois State Representative Angelo “Skip” Fosco Saviano, Fratto does not need the Duff Family or the Bertuca’s.

Clarification: my reference to ‘thugs from back home’ was not meant toward Lou Bertuca.

Thank you. Very helpful article.

Dear Andre,

Updates? Yes, I do.

An individual that was approached in my presence by an Outfit member was threatened along with me for money. I will call this other individual ‘individual X’. Although the incident is useless for me because the judge has ruled that whatever victimization has been inflicted upon me it is not of the courts concern since I filed my lawsuit late. New incidents of victimization against me are not of the courts concern either, because I filed my lawsuit late. I realize this might seem impossible to believe; therefore, I implore you to access the case on the PACER. The case number is 09 cv 01882. In fact, I will post a copy of the transcripts of the December 17, 2009 hearing on this thread very soon. Unfortunately, I was afraid to attend the hearing. Therefore, it was held with out me. In those transcripts, you will be able to read for yourself how I have been further victimized.

However, individual X experienced their victimization by the Outfit with-in the last 4-years. And this individual suffered a loss, which will be explained in their civil RICO complaint against the same defendants that I sued. I presume that individual X will file their suit sometime this summer.

Was it a senseless crime to intimidate me? In my opinion, no, it worked. I did not appear at the dismissal hearing. In addition, the court could have (and should have) ruled in my favor. There is a Supreme Court ruling that I mentioned that indicates that coercion and duress can toll the statute of limitations in a case like mine, when the threat rises to the level of life or death.

However, the court issued its ruling and the case is over. I elected to refrain from appealing because of the intimidation that I sustained recently. I did not go straight to the police at the times of the intimidation, although the experience was extremely intimidating. In one of the situations, going to the police would have caused me to present myself to Melrose Park Police Chief Sam Pitassi’s station, which seemed useless. Instead, I informed Judge Harry Leinenweber. You will have to ask His Honor what he has done about it.

In my opinion, I think that Judge Leinenweber incorrectly surmised that I was a thug like the defendants; therefore, he refused to take part in such a squabble. However, there will be no such mistake with individual X.

I hope you are correct, I hope the Outfit will not hurt my family and me.

Dear Ryan,

If I had the answer, I would have published it. However, I suspect a few reasons.

DiFronzo could be more powerful than imaginable, warranting protection from the ‘powers that be’ (which I think is unlikely).

On the other hand, DiFronzo could be a confidential informant / double agent (which is likely).

Lastly, I could be wrong in my estimation that DiFronzo caught a pass. Perhaps the government is savoring DiFronzo for something bigger in the near future. However, it seems stupid to think the government would throw away an opportunity to take a killer of the streets sooner rather than later. Difronzo could die of old age before he is finally indicted. Therefore, I believe the most intelligent conclusion is that DiFronzo is an informant.

DiFronzo being an informant might explain why my civil case against him was swiftly dismissed, twice. I admit the defense raised good arguments on limitations of time. However, the court simply ignored my argument that duress should extend the time. How could the court honestly not see a valid case of duress in a case like mine? It is not as if I accused the Pope of conspiring to murder and extort protection money from me.

There was a little hiccup in the news a few years back that Marcello and Lombardo were freaking out while being held in the MCC because there was rumor of DiFronzo cooperating with the FEDs on some level.

Let me save everyone a whole lot of time and trouble. Fosco has managed to discredit his source, and also decimated his own credibilty with regard to providing real information on the Outfit. You’re all probably better off reading

Organized Crime & Political Corruption by John Flood & Jim McGough

and

the Deparment of Justice for the Northern District of the State of Illinois’ webpage for Operation Family Secrets

and Kass’ and Wambir’s trial blogs

Flood and McGough run a scrapbook of media clips and judicial transcripts, which have a significant purpose. I support their cause.

Of course, my source is an Outfit guy. And, my source is aware of what I print here. I would never create a dangerous situation for someone by keeping him or her in the dark about something like this.

My guess is that Michael does not know how to operate a computer. I believe he knows how to read. In fact, I read him a great deal of my articles over the phone. I know his son does as well. And he has a few other friends that inform him of my articles and comments.

Michael laughed hard at Tiddy’s stories (via Vin). And so did I.

Dear Bonv,
Please understand that I am not ‘Mags’ secretary. In addition, I have not confirmed that Mags is my source, although it would seem obvious that he is likely my source – again, I am not confirming it.
My source cannot say one way or the other if NY and Philly have communications with each other. Obviously, they have in the past. Communications is sort of a vague question.

Oops, my previous comment was intended for the thread related to the December 21, 2009 article titled ‘Killer/extortionist Rudy Fratto…’

Sorry.