The greatest nut-punch of all is that in 2005 there was a federal challenge to the Constitutionality of Deem and Pass by the activist group Public Citizen. Here is their argument:
“Article I of the United States Constitution requires that before proposed legislation may “become[] a Law,” U.S. CONST. art. I, § 7, cl. 2, “(1) a bill containing its exact text [must be]approved by a majority of the Members of the House of Representatives; (2) the Senate [must]approve[] precisely the same text; and (3) that text [must be]signed into law by the President,” Clinton v. City of New York, 524 U.S. 417, 448, 118 S.Ct. 2091, 141 L.Ed.2d 393 (1998).
“Public Citizen, a not-for-profit consumer advocacy organization, filed suit in District Court claiming that the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005, Pub.L. No. 109-171, 120 Stat. 4 (2006) (“DRA” or “Act”), is invalid because the bill that was presented to the President did not first pass both chambers of Congress in the exact same form. In particular, Public Citizen contends that the statute’s enactment did not comport with the bicameral passage requirement of Article I, Section 7 of the Constitution, because the version of the legislation that was presented to the House contained a clerk’s error with respect to one term, so the House and Senate voted on slightly different versions of the bill and the President signed the version passed by the Senate.
3 Comments
Great article! Last count 211 solid “no”s. If they eventually call a vote i think there will be a tusami of yes to nos if it becomes clear it wont pass. Stay frosty patriots – keep calling capital switchboard 202 224 3121 and emailing!
Dear Theo,
I wish our 15-20 thousand viewers per week were 15-20 million viewers, because many people would appreciate your message.
Great job and on behalf of KTF Media Group thank you for your contributions.
Or for the capital switchboard try 877-sob-usob. Ktf should try getting this article linked on american thinker or big governnent. Very well done.